<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Classic Cars Nissan &#187; porsche</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.classiccarsnissan.com/tag/porsche/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.classiccarsnissan.com</link>
	<description>Local South Jersey Nissan Dealership near Cherry Hill New Jersey and Philadelphia PA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Nissan Vs. Porsche</title>
		<link>http://blog.classiccarsnissan.com/nissan-cars/nissan-vs-porsche/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.classiccarsnissan.com/nissan-cars/nissan-vs-porsche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nissan Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nissan gt-r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porsche]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.classiccarsnissan.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It all started on Tuesday when Porsche announced that it had taken the new Nissan GT-R out for a spin to test some of the company&#8217;s claims. Porsche tested the GT-R at Nurburgring and failed to come close to the claims from Nissan for speed. The company subsequently claimed that Nissan&#8217;s claims for the speed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all started on Tuesday when Porsche announced that it had taken the new Nissan GT-R out for a spin to test some of the company&#8217;s claims. Porsche tested the GT-R at<span> Nurburgring and failed to come close to the claims from Nissan for speed. The company subsequently claimed that Nissan&#8217;s claims for the speed of the vehicle were on non-factory available tires.</span></p>
<p>Uh oh.</p>
<p>Nissan fired back at Porsche at the Paris Auto Show, telling a throng of reporters that they did not cheat and use non-factory tires and that they had no idea how the good folks at Porsche couldn&#8217;t reach the claimed speeds.</p>
<p><span>&#8220;Quite simply we&#8217;re not going to get into a war of words with Porsche,&#8221; said Neil Reeve, Nissan&#8217;s European spokesman. &#8220;The final word from us is that it was done on absolutely standard tires which are available to customers in the showroom. They&#8217;re not trick tires &#8211; absolutely standard tires, normal road tires.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>Using a former F1 driver, Nissan set a lap record of 7 minutes and 29 seconds. When Porsche tried it with an unidentified driver (could&#8217;ve been my grandma), they reached 7 minutes and 54 seconds. In Automobile World, that&#8217;s quite a significant difference and offers more than enough for the two companies to quibble over.</p>
<p>If you think you can take the GT-R for a lap of 7:29, maybe you ought to drop on by a dealer and shop around. If the GT-R is simply too much to handle (as it is for me!), there are plenty of other <a title="Nissan cars" href="http://www.classiccarsnissan.com/featured_vehicles.htm" target="_self">Nissan cars</a> with which to test your grit and determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.classiccarsnissan.com/nissan-cars/nissan-vs-porsche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

